Mass Castration at the Clinic

Clinic doctor performs mass castration on young sex offenders.

back to index

The following story is 100% fiction, and is not intended to bear any 
resemblance to actual people or events, past or present.  Any such 
resemblance is mere coincidence.  Email any comments or suggestions 
to [email protected].



MASS CASTRATION AT THE CLINIC



Dr. Nancy Carlson hung up the phone in her office and sighed 
heavily.  She had just received bad news.  The state legislature had 
scheduled its vote on the repeal of the controversial castration law 
for the next day.  Her clinic’s very existence was in jeopardy.



Dr. Carlson had nurtured a lifelong hatred and resentment of men and 
boys.  The reasons probably dated from her childhood, when she had 
been sexually abused by her father, raped by her uncle, and forced to 
play humiliating sex games with her brothers.  None of these male 
beasts had ever been brought to justice for their crimes.  Her father 
had died when she was a teen, and her uncle was imprisoned several 
years later for grand theft auto.  Upon his release, he had broken 
contact with the family and disappeared.  She had always been too 
afraid and embarrassed to tell her mother about the molestation she 
had suffered at the hands of her brothers.  Regardless, they were 
both married and living in other states now.  They had seemed to 
clean up their acts, but family gatherings were still fraught with 
tension.



So Dr. Carlson had carried her hatred of males with her to college, 
and eventually to medical school.  It was only exacerbated by the 
harassment and sexism she had endured from male students and 
faculty.  She studied to specialize in urology.  This was her way of 
getting back at men.  She would be able to examine them, poke and 
prod them, and cut them in the very place that had given her so much 
pain and discomfort over the years.



She led a regular existence as a run-of-the-mill urologist until five 
years before.  Shortly after her 37th birthday, a newly elected right-
wing legislature in her state had passed a very controversial law 
permitting castration, and in some cases penectomy, of sex 
offenders.  There was a huge outcry from the ACLU and other criminal 
lovers, but the state pushed ahead with the plan anyway.  It drew 
international attention, both good and bad.  Some saw the law as a 
return to barbarism, commenting that her state was trying to become 
“Saudi Arabia in America,” while others saw this as an unfortunate, 
but necessary progression of the criminal law.  Sex offenses had 
increased dangerously in recent decades, and the state was hard-
pressed to address this surge in crime.  The new state government had 
seen castration as a severe punishment to be used as a deterrent, and 
also as a way of rehabilitating hardened criminals.  Research had 
shown castrated males to be gentler, more docile, more cooperative, 
and almost completely uninterested in sex.  



The law had varying degrees of severity.  Multiple convictions for 
non-violent sex offenses such as public indecency, exhibitionism, and 
the like were grounds for an offer of voluntary castration in lieu of 
extensive jail time.  The state courts had been very surprised by the 
number of offenders who elected castration rather than a lengthy jail 
term.  Crimes involving age of consent violations, such as statutory 
rape and child molestation, were punished by mandatory castration 
with no reduction in jail time.  Males convicted of oral sodomy with 
another male were condemned to castration, while men convicted of 
anal sodomy with another male were completely nullified (castrated 
and penectomized), again , all without any reduction in jail time.  
Men convicted of violent sex crimes, such as rape, sexual battery, 
and the like, were similarly nullified.  Incest convictions with 
daughters, nieces, or granddaughters led to castration only, whereas 
incest convictions with sons, nephews, or grandsons led to complete 
nullification.  After a slow start, during which court challenges to 
the harsh new law wound their way through court and were eventually 
thrown out, the floodgates were opened and the number of men and boys 
sentenced to the harsh new punishments skyrocketed.



Dr. Carlson had seen her golden opportunity.  The state was 
contracting out its castrations to private clinics and hospitals, 
since the prison and juvenile detention center infirmaries were 
overwhelmed.  Dr. Carlson had decided to leave her private urology 
practice and establish a state-affiliated castration clinic.  She 
managed to secure the funding and also three other female doctors to 
participate, and managed to purchase an older clinic to refurbish and 
retrofit to be able to handle its new business.  She then set about 
hiring staff.  She had been perplexed by the number of men who had 
applied, but managed to hire a staff of all women.  Nearly three 
years ago, her clinic had opened to much fanfare.  There were others 
like it in the state, but hers was the largest.  After a slow trickle 
of cases in the first months, the pace picked up.  Soon, the clinic 
had almost more castrations than it could handle.  Since opening, her 
clinic had “treated” over 840 men and boys.



The process was all very much the same.  The convicts would be 
brought to the clinic in police vans and unloaded in their orange 
jumpsuits.  They were all shackled at the ankles and their hands were 
bound behind their backs with plastic cord.  Dr. Carlson always 
chuckled inwardly to herself as the male swine were paraded before 
her and into the clinic to the initial processing room.  They always 
had a pathetic look of shock on their faces, for they knew what was 
about to happen to them and were merely counting the minutes until 
they were no longer male.  The fact that their desexing was about to 
be carried out by female doctors made the humiliation they felt that 
much more intense.  Dr. Carlson always found this very amusing.



The first step was to take the men and boys to the “milking” room.  
This was a room with a row of holes on each wall.  Each hole led to 
an electronically stimulating vacuum tube which enveloped a penis and 
caused rapid erection and ejaculation.  The purpose of this room was 
to collect semen samples from the convicts so that if their 
convictions were later overturned, they would be able to use the 
samples to father children.  The samples were collected in glass 
dishes and labeled, then frozen in liquid nitrogen.  They were then 
transported for storage in a central state facility.  The look of 
surprise on the faces of the men and boys as their jumpsuits were 
opened, penises removed and placed in the wall, and then the machine 
was turned on, always brought a smile to Dr. Carlson’s lips.  Just 
like cattle, she thought.



Once into the initial processing room, the males were all 
tranquilized.  Once under, they were unbound and stripped naked.  
They were then dragged or carried to the cleaning room, where they 
were placed under shower heads, with their arms pulled over their 
heads and strapped to chains from the ceiling, and their legs were 
strapped to steel rings in the floor.  They were then soaped and 
rinsed, and then shaved in the groin and peritoneal area by nurses.  
Once dried, they were returned to the processing room and strapped to 
examination tables, where they were given enemas and catheters.  
Their legs were raised and strapped into stirrups, and then they were 
wheeled into the operating room.  Usually this was one at a time, but 
may be up to three at a time, depending on the number of doctors on 
duty.  It was all a very efficient operation.



Once in the OR, the males were anesthetized and readied for 
operation.  If a male was being castrated, circulation was cut off to 
the scrotum by use of an extremely tight rubber castration clamping 
device, which trapped the scrotum and caused it to quickly turn 
purple.  It also made it easier to manipulate and cut.  Although the 
law didn’t specify a method of castration, Dr. Carlson’s clinic was 
notorious for removing the entire scrotum and leaving a smooth patch 
of skin under the penis.  She felt that this was important, for it 
added to the humiliation of the convict.  Other clinics merely 
removed the testicles but preserved the pouch, and some put in 
prosthetic testes so that the scrotum would look normal after the 
surgery.    If the males were to be penectomized as well, the 
clamping device was extended to include the penis, thus cutting off 
circulation and causing it to swell.  This made it easier to cut and 
remove.  Males subject to complete mullification ended up with a 
smooth crotch and a relocated urethral opening to make urination 
easier.



After the operation, the males would be taken to a large recuperation 
room where they would remain for two days until they were well on the 
road to recuperation.  They would then be taken back to prison or 
juvenile detention to serve out the rest of their sentences.  The 
severed genitals were sent for incineration.



This was all now in danger, thought Dr. Carlson.  There had been a 
growing outcry in the state in opposition to the castration law.  
People were becoming upset due to its irreversibility, and a growing 
number of cases of wrongfully convicted men and boys who had been 
castrated and/or penectomized.  There were also the extreme cases:  a 
boy castrated for playing doctor with a neighbor girl, an 18 year old 
male castrated after having been convicted of statutory rape for 
having sex with his 17 year old girlfriend, a growing number of 
happy, settled male couples who were turned in by neighbors to face 
castration and penectomy.  The last election had brought to power a 
new party who pledged to reform the castration law or abolish it 
altogether.  After months of debate, during which the statewide 
number of castrations soared into record territory, the legislature 
had finally brought the matter up to a vote.  They were widely 
expected to vote to repeal the castration law, effective 
immediately.  This would mean an automatic amnesty for all those men 
sentenced to castration or penectomy but who had not yet been cut.  



Dr. Carlson was furious upon learning this.  Her livelihood was about 
to be taken away by a bunch of cowardly legislators.  Not only that, 
but she enjoyed what she did.  She especially loved castrating the 
boys and young men under the age of 25.  They were the most fun for 
her.  Just the scene of a hot young stud strapped to the table, legs 
spread wide in the stirrups, shaved, naked body at her mercy, sweet 
young genitals ready to fall to the knife and come off in HER hands, 
was enough to send her into fits of ecstasy.  How could they take 
that from her?



Dr. Carlson resolved to get in one last thrill before the vote.  The 
clinic had just yesterday received a delivery of males to be 
“treated.”  Since they were delivered so late in the day, they were 
prepped for surgery but then tranquilized and placed in waiting rooms 
so that they could be operated on the next day.  Dr. Carlson had 
watched with interest and great excitement the preparation of the 
twelve men for their surgeries.  They were all under the age of 26, 
the youngest only 13.  She especially liked the “milking” room.  She 
watched and chuckled as the young men pressed their groins to the 
walls of the room, bucking their hips and gyrating in ecstasy.  She 
hoped they enjoyed it, since it was all about to end.



The day before the vote, Dr. Carlson had her nurses strap the 
convicts to the examination tables, put their legs into the stirrups, 
and finish preparations for surgery.  She planned to carry out this 
one last mass castration herself.  She had all twelve young men 
wheeled to the OR.  There was barely enough room for them all, but 
they managed to fit them in.  She put on her surgical scrubs and 
gloves and then pushed her surgical tray into the room.  From behind 
large glass windows, the rest of the staff watched in anticipation.



She approached the first young man.  He looked almost angelic 
strapped to the table, his blond hair brushed back in a cute way, his 
long, heavy eyelashes laying against his slightly tanned cheeks.  His 
smooth, well-developed chest rose and fell softly with his 
breathing.  She looked at her chart, and the rage began to well up 
within her.



WELLS, THOMAS P.  Age:  15y, 4m.  Conviction:  Sexual Battery of 
sister; Public Indecency.  Sentence:  Castration; Penectomy; Urethral 
Relocation.



Dr. Carlson grabbed her scalpel and looked at the boy’s bulging, 
swollen, purple genitals.  They would be so easy to lop off.  Her 
juices began to flow.  She reached down and grabbed the boy’s tender 
scrotum and pulled it down as far as it would go.  Bringing the 
scalpel to the edge of the scrotum, she took one more look at the 
boy’s sweet face.  A sweet face which hid a beast.  She began 
cutting. . .



Soon, it was over.  All twelve boys and young men had been 
“treated.”  Dr. Carlson watched as the patients were wheeled to the 
recuperation room, and she began to remove her surgical scrubs.  As 
she did, she looked over to see a nurse placing the piles of severed 
scrotums, testes, and a few penises into plastic baggies for their 
trip to the incinerator.  She would really miss her work, she 
thought, as tears welled up in her eyes.