The coed he'd raped was with him. She said that the college was furious with her. He was an important member of the football team, they were near the end of the season and had hopes of going to a bowl game, and without his testicles he couldn't play aggressively enough for their team to win. She was afraid the college would find some way to punish her for ruining their football team and it wouldn't help her career prospects to have to sue them over that. On the other hand, she wouldn't back down about having him castrated or prosecuted. When the prosecutor had asked her if she was willing to give him the choice between those, she'd agreed that he should have the right to choose which he wanted. He'd chosen castration and she'd back him on that.

The offender said that staying out of prison was more important to him than football. He thought that the college wanted to keep him out on bail until the bowl games were over, and after that they didn't care if he went to prison or not. He was siding with his victim over this. She'd come with him in the hopes that I could find a solution that would satisfy both of them.

She said that he was right about the college. They'd pressured her and the prosecutor, trying to get her to withdraw her permission for him to choose castration and get the prosecutor to accept her withdrawal. She wouldn't back down on that either.

I asked if I would be correct in summarizing their position as follows: She wanted revenge for being raped and they were here because they'd agreed that she would watch him being castrated and that would be her revenge. They were both being badly treated by the college, and they were willing to work together after his castration to get their joint revenge for that. They agreed, that was exactly right.

I asked her how the prosecutor had felt about being pressured by the college, and she said that he didn't like it any better than she did, but it was an elective office and he might give in to the pressure. I said that I had an idea, and left to make a phone call. I called the prosecutor and asked if there was some way to keep secret what was happening in the case until after the bowl games. He chuckled and asked when the castration would take place. I said that it would probably be tomorrow evening; I'd know for sure tomorrow morning. He said that he'd hold a press conference that afternoon, while he could still say that the player hadn't been castrated. He'd say that there had been too much speculation and publicity about this case and it was interfering with the proper functioning of the justice system. Neither he nor his office would be making any further statements about the case until after the bowl games were over, and he was asking everyone else involved to do the same.

I returned and told the coed that we normally terminate a single offender's ability to have sex immediately after we castrate him. I suggested that if she asked us to delay terminating his ability to have sex until after the bowl games it would make it much easier for them to get their revenge. She asked me to explain what would happen if she made that request.

I said that when we castrated offenders we didn't damage their appearance. We replaced their testicles with prostheses that looked natural. They also could supply various hormones and measure hormone levels. That meant that he could continue to have the testosterone he needed to win football games for as long as she wanted him to have it. What happened here would be kept secret, so no one would know that he'd been castrated unless he was examined carefully enough to notice the minor scars from his castration. We would use natural hormones rather than synthetic ones so the difference couldn't be detected by a blood test. We'd temporarily leave intact his ability to have sex because we needed to make sure that everyone would assume that he hadn't been castrated. If he continued having sex with all the willing coeds until after the bowl games, no one would believe he'd been castrated before then. His scars wouldn't show unless the girl was handling his scrotum, so he should turn out the lights, or at least have them very dim, before things progressed that far. If one did notice the scars, he should tell her they were from a vasectomy.

It would also help if all the willing coeds were sure that he was going to be castrated after the bowl games, wanted to bed him while they could, and were more successful than before in bedding him. It needed to look like he was getting all the sex he could before he lost the ability to get it, and that was just what he would in fact be doing.

What the coed might not like was that it would cost her some time. She would have to stay here a few more days and learning how to adjust his hormone levels. She would have to go to the football games and would need to be able to get close to him several times during the game. She'd need to use what would look like a hand-held computer when she was near him. They might have some difficulty arranging that without arousing suspicion. What I was suggesting might violate NCAA rules, but I didn't know or care about that and the college wouldn't know so no one could blame them. Was this what they wanted to do?

They talked it over and decided that it was worth the risk. If they got caught, it would be by his coach and if they confessed to the coach he'd probably decided to keep it secret. They both wanted me to do what I'd suggested.

I explained to him that one of the girls would evaluate him today, probably having sex with him a few times, and unless she found reason to reject him she'd spend some time tomorrow letting him enjoy his last day of sex before he was castrated. If she enjoyed having sex with him and he was man enough to do it, they'd spend the day doing it. That afternoon the prosecutor would hold a press conference announcing that there wouldn't be any more statements about the case until after the bowl games. Some reporter was sure to ask if he knew if the player had been castrated, and he'd say that he'd confirmed that the player was still intact. That evening she'd castrate him.

He could talk with the girls and decide which one of those willing he wanted to castrate him. He asked why he couldn't have a girl who had gone through puberty. I told him we preferred to use girls who weren't bothered by lust. He talked to the girls, and finally chose Jasmine, who was eleven at the time.

Jasmine spent more time evaluating him that I expected and I later asked her what the problem had been. She said that she'd been quick to evaluate him; he was just the kind of person we wanted to castrate. What had taken the time was that he was very good at consensual sex and was nice to her. She'd decided to take time to enjoy him while she could. She'd just taken time to give me a report and was going to go back and enjoy him some more.

When they were both exhausted, they slept together, then woke up and spent the next day having sex. An alarm rang and she told him she couldn't give him any more to drink; she didn't want him getting sick when she castrated him. She told him to ejaculate in her as many times as he could before his thirst forced him to stop. She'd enjoyed him and wanted him as many more times as possible before she castrated him.

He finally couldn't take it anymore and Jasmine took him to where we did the castrations. The coed was waiting there to watch. Jasmine castrated him and the coed said that as far as she was concerned, the rape issue was now closed and she'd work with him dealing with the bowl game issue. She said, "Deal?" and held out her hand. He took it, shook it, and replied "Deal."

Jasmine gave him a drink and told him and the coed that she'd start working with them the next morning getting his hormone levels right and teaching the coed how to do that. She would also be checking his recovery over the next two days. She told the coed that someone who'd been castrated but left with the ability to ejaculate had to ejaculate twenty times to purge his system of sperm before he could be released. Jasmine said that she'd do it unless the coed wanted to do it. The coed said that the rape issue was closed and the best way to make sure neither of them doubted that was for her to do the purging. After the coed was sure she knew what to do, particularly at football games, Jasmine released him and he and the coed went back to college.

The college was right to be concerned about him. They made it to a bowl game, came close to winning, and no one was the wiser about what we'd done. The coed thought that the college deserved to lose and made some hormone adjustments. We watched the game on TV and after two critical time-outs he didn't play quite aggressively enough and it cost the college the bowl game.

The next weekend, he and the coed were back to finish what Jasmine would normally have done as soon as she'd castrated him. She asked him if he wanted a day or more of sex first, or if he wanted his shots now. He turned to the coed and asked her if she'd forgive him a day early and spend the day with him. If not, he'd tell Jasmine no.

The coed stood looking at him, not saying a word, until he finally asked her if her silence meant that he shouldn't have asked. She said, no, part of her was saying no, no, you raped me, I'll never let you have sex with me and another part of her was saying that it wanted to celebrate their victory over the college. He had to wait for one side to win. A few minutes later, she turned to Jasmine and asked her to find them a room.

The next day Jasmine took them to where we did the castrations and started giving him shots, telling him and the coed what each one would do.

1. This one would destroy the nerve that caused the right side of his penis to get firm when he was stimulated.

2. This one would destroy his right Cowper's Gland. It produced precoital fluid.

3. This one would keep his right ampulla from supplying fructose for his semen.

4. This one would keep his right seminal vesicle from making over 30% of what would become his semen.

5. This one would destroy the nerve that caused the left side of his penis to get firm when he was stimulated. Now he wouldn't be able to get an erection. She demonstrated that.

6. This one would destroy his left Cowper's Gland. Now he wouldn't be able to make precoital fluid. She demonstrated that.

7. This one would keep his left ampulla from supplying fructose for his semen. Now his semen wouldn't contain fructose.

8. This one would keep his left seminal vesicle from making over 30% of what would become his semen. He'd now lost the ability to produce the components that made up over two-thirds of his semen.

9. This one would destroy the part of his prostate gland that made the final component of his semen. Now he wouldn't be able to ejaculate because he couldn't make any semen. She made him ejaculate one last time to empty him of semen.

10. This one would destroy the nerve that caused his prostate to contract. Now he wouldn't be able to have an orgasm.

11. This one would start the process of the right half of his prostate shrinking so it wouldn't cause him problems later in life.

12. This one would start the process of the left half of his prostate shrinking so it wouldn't cause him problems later in life.

He asked Jasmine if she'd left anything in working order. Yes, she'd left the right and left vas deferens in working order, but they transported sperm to his ampullae and without testicles there wouldn't be any sperm to transport. She'd also left him with erotic sensation in his penis. He'd still enjoy trying to masturbate, but nothing would happen, leaving him frustrated.